Miscellaneous Monday

The Internet, considering the scope of human history, is in its infancy, yet it is already revolutionizing the meaning of the hijacked word “church.”  Web 2.0 refers to the way the Internet has evolved so that people can come together to collaborate on projects, “harnessing collective intelligence,” (Tim O’Reilly) sharing information both new and long-forgotten.  Consequently, the institutional church is being turned upside-down and inside out, with the very nature of authority being redefined by the fact that many teachings of authors, theologians, and pastors are finally, after so many centuries of darkness, being exposed to the light of scrutiny.  Controversial subjects that were once relegated to the pastor’s office are now being examined in the marketplace, where the men in suits have no power to shut down productive conversations. We are now only beginning to see how God is demonstrating to the world the fundamental difference between institutions run by a handfuls of people who have everything to lose if the institution in its current state fails and the organic, non-commercialized, collaborative body of Christ (the real church), and it is with a great sense of excitement and expectation that we move into a new century in the Reign of Christ.

It’s a new year, and I’ve got a new blogging plan!  As a writer, I have yet to master the art of brevity.  I’ve been following a blog recently called “Seven Sentences.”  Since this is my final semester at UCF and I’m in the process of moving and I’m going to be looking for a job, my time is limited over the next six months.  Using Seven Sentences as inspiration, I’ve decided to keep my Monday through Friday blog posts to exactly five sentences.  This may free some time throughout the week to work on a lengthier blog or two, which will be posted on the weekend.  Here’s my blogging plan for the first half of 2013:

Miscellaneous Monday: Anything goes!  Random topics.  You’ll never know what to expect.  Guest blogs might show up here.

Tuesday Tribute: Recognizing others in the blogosphere with a link and my brief comments.

Wordless Wednesday: A photo or video blog.  The video would probably have words, though :)

Thursday Thanksgiving: Self-explanatory…

Friday Fears: Names and (hopefully) defuses a fear.

Saturday/Sunday Series: A longer blog post on one or more of the  whatgoddoes.com blog series (Why Chan Can’t Erase Hell, an apologetic critique of Francis Chan’s book, Erasing Hell; Review of Rachel Evans’ book: A Year of Biblical Womanhood, Theodicy series based on Thomas Long’s book: What Shall We Say? Evil, Suffering, and the Crisis of Faith; Revelation; and/or a series I haven’t started yet about the similarities between the institution of slavery and the institutional church).

And now for Friday Fears:

SCRUTINY

Screen shot 2013-01-18 at 10.01.27 AM

 

I won’t mention any names, but recently my husband was unfriended on Facebook by someone from our former church, because he occasionally (and respectfully) questioned or challenged the underlying orthodox assumptions in the said Facebook friend’s status updates.

The Facebook friend wanted to relegate these kind of discussions to private message instead of having them in the public news feed via his profile page.

Tim questioned/challenged the idea of censoring such discussions from public view, because if the belief or concept one adheres to or promotes is truth, it will stand in the light of scrutiny, which only serves to eliminate error and promote truth.

His Facebook friend responded by deleting his comment and unfriending him.

Well, folks, this is my fifth sentence in the Friday Fears blog post, so I’ll close with this thought: If the root cause of the fear of scrutiny in this case is really the fear of being humiliated or embarrassed because one has spent his entire life believing and promoting error, then which outcome is worse, continuing to believe and promote error or allowing scrutiny to unveil the truth with all its uncomfortable yet liberating consequences?

What, exactly, is the Reign of God?  Here’s what Jesus has to say about the Reign of God.  I’ve paraphrased it for you below, or you can click here to read it for yourself in the Young’s Literal Translation:

The Reign of God is not a human system of order being run by human decision-makers.  If it was, I would have allowed My disciples to defend Me from the leaders within that system who wanted to have Me crucified.  In God’s Reign, God is the decision-maker Who doesn’t use fear tactics and force to accomplish His purposes.  In this world, people who have popularity, wealth, or credentials are considered to the most important, but in the Reign of God, things are opposite.  (Jesus brings a child into the middle of the group.) Take this child, for instance.  You must be humble, like a child to enter into the Reign of God.  In contrast, a rich person whose sense of security is in wealth will find it very difficult to enter in.  But here’s what I can guarantee – whatever you lose for the sake of the Reign of God, it will be well worth your while, not only in this age, but also in the age to come.  You’ll be generously compensated with spiritual riches, which are far better than any popularity, wealth, or credentials you once had.

The Reign of God is such good news that I talk about it with anyone who will listen.  (Jesus tells his disciples something privately: Here’s the thing.  At this time, God is only giving the understanding of His Reign to you.  That’s why I speak in parables.  Not everyone is meant to understand His Reign at once.  Right now, I’ll tell them what they need to know most, that is…) the Reign of God is very near!  It is time to experience a change of thinking that is so radical that it will be evidenced in your life – the way you relate to God and others.  I’m traveling all around healing people so that what I do is evidence that I have been sent by God with this message.

Do you know what kind of people enter into the Reign of God?  People who don’t think too highly of themselves, who recognize that any talents, abilities, opportunities, or possessions they have are God-given.  Those who get mistreated for doing the right thing.  People who practice what they preach.  You’ve heard of John the Baptist, right?  That seemingly perfect prophet-type guy who probably makes you feel spiritually intimidated because of the authority he was given by God to introduce me to the world – Did you know that a person who is considered unpopular or unimportant by human standards is greater than John the Baptist in the Reign of God ?  The kind of people who enter into the Reign of God live a life of love that puts religious leaders or religious experts and their so-called righteousness to shame.  There are those who claim to act in my name, making an elaborate show of religion, but then they turn around and do and say things that I would never do or say.  Don’t be fooled into thinking this is how people enter into the Reign of God.

When you pray, tell God that you are watching and waiting to discover how He is turning things around, how eventually, it becomes obvious that His will is being accomplished after all.   The Reign of God on earth, as it is in Heaven – this is what really matters.  A lot of people try to impose their own ideas about the Reign of God on others, to bring the Reign of God about in their own time and their own forceful way.  There’s a long history of the human tendency to act this way about the Reign of God.  But, things are changing.  These people who use the Reign of God as a weapon are fighting among themselves, and eventually, the whole system will collapse.  As it is, they accuse me of having evil powers – but I am doing away with evil!  This is the beginning of the human race having their eyes opened to the Reign of God.  The Reign of God is happening, right now, within you.

Some people equate the Reign of God to religion or to a particular church.  Let’s compare the things that Jesus said about the Reign of God to the institutional church.  I substitute the words “your church” or “church member” (here I reference local church as a cog in the machine of man-made institutions and organized systems of religion, not the God-ordained “ecclesia“) for the words “Reign of God” in the form of true statements, using Christ’s ideas as a pattern  in the bullet points below.

  • Your church is not a human system of order being run by human decision-makers.  In your church, God is the decision-maker.
  • The church members who are leaders typically have the humble nature of a child.
  • A rich person will find it very difficult to be a member of your church.
  • Becoming a church member may result in loss of popularity, wealth, or credentials.
  • Your church is such good news that you want to (and do) talk about it all the time with anyone who will listen – coworkers, family, friends, strangers.
  • The people who go to your church get mistreated for doing the right thing. (Please don’t confuse this with the all-too-common being mistreated for being a judgmental religious snob.)
  • The leaders of your church practice what they preach.
  • President Obama and Richard Dawkins are considered greater than John the Baptist in your church.
  • The church members in your church live a life of love that puts religious leaders or religious experts and their so-called righteousness to shame.
  • When you pray, you tell God that you are watching and waiting to discover how He is turning things around, how eventually, it becomes obvious that His will is being accomplished after all, because your church on earth, as it is in Heaven – this is what really matters.
  • The human race is having their eyes opened to your church.  Your church is happening, right now.  Your church is within you.

Do you see the difference between the Reign of God and religion/church?  If you do, then whether you attend church or not, whether you affiliate with a certain religion or not, you are the *ecclesia.

*Ecclesia:

1577 ekklēsía(from 1537 /ek, “out from and to” and 2564 /kaléō, “to call”) – properly, people called out from the world and to God…

How do I know you are the ecclesia, just because you see the difference between the Reign of God and religion/church?  Because, “If any one may not be born from above, he is not able to see the Reign of God” (Jesus – John 3:21).  If you see it, you are born from above.  In contrast, if you read the bullet list and get all flustered, you may not yet be “out from” the reign of humanity.  Churchianity tends to create a dichotomy of church and “the world” (everything/everyone not church).  But in reality, the world is just as present in the church as the ecclesia is present in the world.

“In the Hebrew Scriptures there is no word for spiritual. And Jesus never used the phrase spiritual life. Because for Jesus and his tradition, all of life is spiritual.  Everything is spiritual.” – Rob Bell

Have you ever had a moment when you discover spiritual truth in an unexpected way?  This happens to me when I watch movies or TV shows, hear music, have conversations with other people, or in the ordinary activities of my day.  God is always with us, and if we are sensitive to that idea, we become disciples (from “discere”meaning “to learn”) of the greatest Teacher ever.

Today, I typed notes as I listened to Card’s lecture on various aspects of fiction writing. The analogy of God-as-author and we-as-characters is inadequate and flawed.  The main problem with the analogy is that God loves us, His very REAL non-fiction characters.  And the Plan of the Ages is so much more than a story.  Nevertheless, for people who are able to look past what doesn’t fit, the analogy is loaded with spiritual truth.  Card is an author who is very concerned with explaining why people do what they do, and as an author, he explores the human condition through his fictional characters and circumstances in various settings from familiar to alien.  I always find some spiritual truth in his books because of this. In his writing class, he explains the brainstorming processes and techniques that he uses to invent his wonderfully imaginative stories, and like his books, I also glean spiritual truths from his lessons.

I’d like to share a few excerpts from the notes I typed today.  Card’s ideas and words (my paraphrase, NOT direct quotes) are in bold.  My observations are in regular type.

Writers tend to retreat from the scene that really ought to be written.  This can happen as a character flashback or narrative digression.  If you find yourself doing this, ask yourself, what is so important about the scene that I want to retreat from it?  This is the very thing you need to write.  This is what is powerful and interesting to the reader.  (And on a funnier note, if you want to make a character throw up, it is probably because you are hiding from writing a real scene.)

When I first began to notice inconsistencies and believability problems with spiritual concepts that I had always assumed were true (because the institutional church said so), my natural inclination was to retreat.  I was afraid explore, because what if I actually found something that clearly contradicted beliefs that were foundational to my understanding of Who God is or what God does?  What would my church friends think of me, if I were to challenge the “truth” of the pastor or highly respected elders?  Does God approve of “dangerous” critical examination of orthodoxy?  Am I allowed to do that?

As it turns out, God wouldn’t have it any other way.

Consequently, I have learned to recognize that when someone introduces an idea and I have the urge to retreat from it, I stop and ask myself why.  What is so important about the idea that I want to retreat from it?  This may be the very idea I need to explore.  This may be an interesting and powerful concept that God, the author and finisher of faith, wants me to understand.

The real question, then, is do I trust God enough to keep me from serious spiritual misdirection?  If the idea turns out to be false or corrupt, do I trust Him to keep me from embracing it in ignorance?  And what if I get it all wrong?  Do I trust God to set the record straight?  Do I believe that His love for me does not depend on me having an accurate understanding of everything?

Someone can be a brilliant writer, but if there is no story, that talent is wasted.

A pastor can be a brilliant speaker and natural leader, but it doesn’t mean he has the final say on what you ought to believe.

Christians can build magnificent churches and put on a high quality Sunday morning show, but if there is no hope in their message, why bother?

God can create billions of unique human beings, but if there is no hope, His creative act was a waste of time.

If you write, “She was sure that…” or “She believed that…” from the point of view of that character, you are actually introducing doubt.  If you are giving directions to someone of how to get to your house, you don’t say, “I’m sure that you turn right on Holden” or “I believe that you turn right on Holden”, and if you did, people would think that you don’t know where you live.

I think that this one speaks for itself.  There are times when we ought to say, “I believe ___” but we don’t.  And there are times when we ought to say just say, “___” but we add, “I believe” to it.  The trick is knowing when to recognize that you are a fallible human being, and knowing that there are some truths about Who God is or what God does that transcend our innate ability to screw things up.

If you have a character that is supposed to play a minor role and the character keeps becoming more important to the story than originally planned, don’t let the character just take over the story, go back to your original story plan and rethink it to include the minor character as a major character.

If you have an acquaintance that has a minor role in your life, and the he or she keeps becoming more important to your spiritual journey than you expected, don’t let the him or her just take over your spiritual journey, go back to who God created you to be and what God created you to do, and consider how God may want to include him or her in your spiritual journey.


 

“Nature and Nature’s laws lay hid in night; God said Let Newton be! and all was light.”

Alexander Pope (1688–1744), British satirical poet.  Epitaph Intended for Sir Isaac Newton in Westminster Abbey (1730).

 

During Galileo’s childhood, the most widely accepted belief about the mechanism to explain planetary motion was that planets rode on an eternally unchanging solid crystalline sphere.  However, a supernova and a very bright comet, likely seen and remembered by Galileo, shook this seemingly firm foundation of the universe.  Between this and the “wandering planets” (two words some people use to describe any pesky little details that just don’t fit current scientific understanding), Galileo began to see the universe as a clock where motions are caused by some force.

It is no secret that Galileo’s ideas, and empirical science in general, were fiercely opposed by religious leaders.

Both in science and in religion, when someone takes the time to think ideas through, to examine, meditate upon, and imagine explanations for wandering planets, it often leads to some of the greatest discoveries mankind has known. Newton’s Mercury did not follow planetary laws, and had Newton left the idea alone, we might not have benefitted from Einstein’s subsequent laws of gravity – concepts that radically changed our understanding of space and time.  It has been suggested that Newton’s ideas about attractive and repulsive forces were inspired by his dabbling in the practice of alchemy.  This practice was frowned upon by religious leaders.  The way I see it, God knows exactly what He is doing, and if alchemy is what Newton needed in order to make his important discoveries, then God placed Newton in such an environment purposefully – so that Newton could hone his thinking-outside-the-box skills.

The same concept can be applied to pesky scriptures that don’t conform to widely accepted doctrine as well as an innate (God-given) understanding that somewhere along the way, humanity really screwed up true spirituality with religious dogma.  Orthodox Christians can look down their noses at people who read their horoscopes, go to palm readers, get involved in Scientology or mysticism.  Meanwhile, God is doing what He inevitably does best – revealing Himself to people.  Sometimes that revelation takes place through a long and difficult learning experience, a path of trial and error.

Giving people the breathing space to explore spiritual matters without condemnation is often viewed, through the orthodox lens, as condoning Satanic or antichrist activity.  But this view does not take into account the possibility that God stoops to the individual’s current level of understanding.  He knows what knowledge an individual can and can’t receive at any given season in his or her life. Furthermore, God is the only one who knows the intentions of the individual’s heart – whether his or her intent might be defined as the exact opposite of antichrist, that is, he or she may be hungry for spiritual truth, a desire to know God that has been initiated by God Himself, and may be acting upon that desire in the only manner he or she knows.  Who are these spiritual police, who know little or nothing about our Father’s timetable and method of reconciliation, to stand in judgment of their brothers and sisters?  God stoops for all of us, not just heretics and heathens.  Every one of us, every day, maybe even every hour or minute, are all in need of God’s grace.

In scientific theories about gravitation, the new “wandering planets” include extra fast moving stars, the rate of expansion of the universe, extra energetic photons.  In spiritual theories, the new “wandering planets” are not even on the table for consideration, at least not within the walls of the orthodox institutions.  I believe that God allowed a wedge to be driven between science and religion for a very good reason: so that religious people would become sick to death of religion-in-a-box and learn a thing or two from the scientific community about considering all possibilities, having the ability to admit that perhaps there have been and continue to be some terrible misunderstandings about Who God is and what God does.  In fact, this has already begun – look at the mass exodus of the human population from the institutional church.*  People will discover the significant difference between religion and spirituality.  In addition, people will discover that science and spirituality, like intellect and emotion, are both necessary in order to unravel the mysteries of the universe.  It’s only a matter of time…

 

*Read or listen to NPR’s story, “You Lost Me”: Young Christians Rethink Faith